Watching three different versions of Madama Butterfly made me understand different aspects of the story, but there were also differences between each of the versions. The movie version was extremely well made and I thought the movement of the camera really enhanced the story. There were many occasions of complex dolly movements that made you focus on certain elements when they became more prevalent throughout the scene. I also thought the use of foreground and background elements was used to great effect when Madama learns that Pinkerton’s American wife wants her child. Madama and Suzuki are facing each other in the foreground and in the background, Pinkerton’s wife is placed right between them, like a ominous wall severing Madama’s life.
The opera version performed in the Met was also well done but the most off putting thing was the fact they used a puppet to play Madama’s son. The puppet appeared to be operated by three people who were wearing black and it took me out of the experience seeing Madama being so emotional to an inanimate object. I did enjoy the set dressing on stage from the acts we watched. My favorite element was the China light balls used because I like their aesthetic and the light they emit.
The animated version was extremely interesting and artistic. I really liked the fact that it was done with stop-motion animation which brought a certain level of craftsmanship to the film. The lighting of the miniature sets was also done very well to try to make it seem as lifelike as possible. The ending of Madama removing her skin, then dismantling her limbs was my favorite part of the piece and separated it from the movie and opera version.

Comments
Post a Comment